Some Notes on Mind and Passive Awareness
Naftaly Ramrajkar
“Meditation is the process of understanding oneself. Self-knowledge brings wisdom. And the mind begins to understand the whole process of itself. It becomes very quiet, completely still, without any sense of movement or demand. Then, perhaps, that which is not measurable comes into being.”
- Krishnamurti; Collected Works of J. Krishnamurti, Six lectures given at Hamburg, Germany, 1956.
The conscious mind is what we use in our everyday waking life and it includes perceptions, memories, concepts, imaginations, emotions and desires.
The unconscious mind was discovered very recently. The whole of unconscious is below the ‘threshold of consciousness’; we can be conscious only what is above the threshold. Like an iceberg, above the water is conscious, below the water is unconscious.
Between conscious and unconscious, just below the threshold of consciousness lies the region of subconscious, which hold all the skills and knowledge we have acquired. It is the region of our abilities and talents, not fully conscious but easily made so when required.
Between the subconscious and the unconscious there lies the main dividing line, what may be called the threshold of suppressions, which can be crossed only with the greatest difficulty and usually under abnormal conditions.
The unconscious contains not only the memories of everything that has ever happened to us but also our biological, racial, national and family heritage as well as painful experiences of the past, mostly those of early childhood.
It is the threshold of suppression that is the cause of trouble, because it keeps the vast content of the unconscious away from the conscious, though it cannot completely prevent the unconscious from affecting deeply our actions and sometimes bursting through the barrier; invading our life in various forms of insanity.
Krishnamurti stresses the importance of breaking down the barrier of repression and finding a way of bringing the unconscious in to the field of conscious.
The image that is usually chosen to describe the mind is that of an iceberg. The water line is the threshold; the tiny visible part above it is the conscious mind, whilst the huge submerged portion represents the unconscious. If we melt away the top of the iceberg, the iceberg will gradually rise up and if the process of melting is maintained, the entire iceberg will ultimately disappear and only the ocean will remain.
This process of melting the iceberg can be maintained by a piece of ice shaped like a lens to create a hot spot to melt away the ice.
This is exactly what we need to do; to create in our conscious mind a focus of intense passive awareness, of full consciousness of its content and watch the content dissolving and new content emerging to dissolve in its turn. This process will eventually break down the barrier between the conscious and the unconscious.
In fact, the conscious and unconscious together form one mind and dividing line is accidental. The opacity of the barrier makes direct awareness of the unconscious impossible, but it is possible to gradually bring the unconscious into conscious by a process of simplifying and reducing the resistance of the conscious content. This is done by fully passively aware of the whole content.
Both the subconscious and the unconscious are composed of memories, of two kinds: factual and psychological.
The former are memories of factual experiences, judgements of facts. They create no problems as they are helpful to the conscious mind, enabling it to learn by experience. Psychological memories are those of past valuation or ‘judgement of value’, each heavily charged with emotions. They do not rise to the conscious mind individually or as separate factors, but as a vague background, a coloring, a conditioning of the conscious content.
This conditioning obeys no fixed rules and follows no fixed pattern.
Conditioning of mind is divided into two classes or kinds: 1) Primary 2) Secondary
Secondary conditioning is related to the more obvious problems of life, the miseries, sorrows, conflicts, frustrations, worries and fears which are the common lot of men. There are general lines, grooves or channels along which conditioning usually flows.
Primary conditioning: Habitual conditioning which is universally present in all forms, is the presence of the ‘self’ or ‘I’. Wherever there is conditioning, there is the presence of ‘I’, and conversely, wherever ‘self-consciousness’ exist, conditioning is bound to be there.
This primary conditioning is at the root of all our problems, and arises out of this the very nature of all mental activities.
This primary conditioning takes three distinct forms:
- Partial use of our minds
- More emphasis is given to ‘what was’ and ‘what will be’ than to ‘what is’.
- Mind works in dichotomy, pairs of opposites; e.g subject/object, thinker/thought, experiencer/experience.
It somehow cannot see the ‘Antiphony’ in nature but only pairs of opposites.
This thinker takes form of ‘Self’ or ‘I’, the owner of body and mind, who is continually engaged in strengthening and expanding itself.
We should live with whole of our mind (Wholistic) and not only with a small portion of it, which is least interesting. It is also already impressed with stale memories and valuation.
Actually, part of the mind dominated by self-consciousness is a wasted, crippled part almost impervious to Life, to Truth and to Joy.
Primary conditioning truncates the total mind, while secondary conditioning distorts and maims that part of the mind which we use daily and call our own.
This double conditioning deeply affects our relationship with others; the primary separates us from our fellow being whilst the secondary pits us against them.
In short, we cannot cure conditioning by more conditioning. Therefore, generally methods of meditations or intellectual discipline, austerity or physical discipline, cultivation of virtues, moral discipline, practice of prayers or religious discipline, introductions of reforms or social discipline does not help.
No amount of efforts can destroy memory. The only remedy against our conditioning is to accept the fact, to see it as conditioning, to go down to its very roots and having laid it bare, to look at it without justification, identification or condemnation, in passive and silent awareness, without calling it one’s own.
Passive awareness is effective because it destroys the ignorance of primary conditioning and the possessiveness of secondary. When we try to see that our mind is conditioned, conditioning withers away.
Passive awareness puts an end to all forms and habits of thinking to which conditioned mind has been accustomed, as well as to the emotional reactions caused by conditioning.
Passive awareness gives us insight into working of our mind.
It is important to clear the mind of problems, for a mind tortured by conflicts is useless. We need a mind that is free from all conditioning, a transformed or unconditioned mind; for only then are we able to discover truth, reality, God – whatever the name we give to the Unknown. What we discover reflects the quality of our mind. We cannot discover what is quite foreign to the mind and for the discovery of the real we need a clear, a real mind, not a mere bundle of memories and habits, problems and conflicts. To find a real mind, we must first understand the full significance of that state which is a ‘passive awareness’.
A ‘Passive Awareness’ is important because it is the only means for putting an end to wrong thinking and distorted feeling, both of which not only make us utterly unhappy as individuals, but when projected on a larger scale threatens the whole of humanity.
A mind that is conditioned and mind that is aware that it is conditioned are entirely different states. The former will get more and more entangled in the meshes of its own conditioning, because it does not know that it is conditioned, much less how it can be free of the conditioning.
A mind that is aware of its conditioning, on the other hand, is already on the way towards disentangling itself and, therefore, is proof against further conditioning. The state of ‘Passive Awareness’ is both curative and protective.
References:
- Krishnamurti & The Texture of Reality by A.D. Dhopeshwarkar
- Krishnamurti and The Experience of The Silent Mind by A.D. Dhopeshwarkar
- Yoga of J. Krishnamurti: A Catechism by A.D. Dhopeshwarkar
- J. Krishnamurti and Awareness in Action by A.D. Dhopeshwarkar
- The Nameless Experience by Rohit Mehta
- Philosophy of J. Krishnamurti by R.K. Shringy
- That Pathless Land by Susunaga Weeraperuma
- J.Krishnamurti as I Knew Him by Susunaga Weeraperuma
- Saying of J. Krishnamurti by Susunaga Weeraperuma
Some of these books are out of print but available from the Acorn Press for regular price.
Web Site:
http://www.intuitiveapp.com/acornpress/product-category/author/a-d-dhopeshwarkar/
NR![]()

![]()
This retreat, hosted by Mukesh Gupta in June, was an extremely inspiring one and we met for meditation every morning before starting the dialogues for the day. Sometimes there was an excerpt of haunting flute music from the Himalayas or the dulcimer tones of the santoor. The group also did a few exercises during the six-day retreat as we shared this extraordinary space and we undertook one memorable exercise in pairs. David Bruneau was my partner and each pair took a card with a theme written on it. Our card was “Cooperation”.
This was a very nice theme for both of us since we have each spent quite a bit of time during our lives living in communities with other people, and, of course, communal living is not possible without cooperation. David asked me for my observations on the subject and we discussed these together out on the lawn in front of the Mainhouse on a perfectly sunny day.
We agreed that since communal living requires cooperation, it entails a certain diminishing of the ego. There is a lessening of self-identification as one embraces a wider world view based on the experience of many people in the community rather than just being limited to one’s own isolated opinion. There is also less emphasis on personal possessions in a communal environment as one is often called upon to share things with others. Personally, this sort of living, also diminished my interest in the family unit and in engaging in possessive relationships. David also had a similar experience. Finally, we concluded that the UN could benefit from the experience of living all together on an estate and speculated that it may instill a greater spirit of cooperation among the member states. At the very least, the UN might start with a six-day retreat like this delightful one and invite Mukesh to be their facilitator!
The last evening of the retreat was a beautiful bacchanal of music, singing, and dancing in the Meditation Room where there had been arguments, tears, agreement, and hugs before the final goodbye on the next day.
CS
June Retreat with Mukesh Gupta from the KFI
This past month, a friend and I travelled to Brockwood Park for a five day intensive study/dialogue retreat on the topic:
“Death: the end of everything or the start of something new?”
As always, on this, my fourth visit, alighting at Brockwood is to breathe in deeply, the perfume, the silence, the peaceful beauty of the buildings and surrounding landscape. It is such a contrast with the hurly burly of getting there and one can always count on a warm welcome, a cup of tea and a nourishing meal, prepared largely with food from the gardens or local produce. There is, ever present, a quiet diligence of the staff and guest helpers working behind the scenes to support the visitors who are there for inquiry.
In this particular group, there were twelve of us, from divergent cultures, ages and backgrounds, which made for a rich variety of life experience. At first we knew each other not, yet by the end of the week we had become close companions. Overtly, we had our differences, but a sense of communion was developing by itself, building upon the willingness to look together at the ‘what is’ of our lives within the context of the topic. Not easy! Stephen Smith was our guide, whose competence and immersion in the teachings over very many years served us well when things started to bog down.
The days of study retreat are generously balanced at Brockwood with plenty space for personal contemplative time, or for informal dialogues. Many participants pick up K’s lead by taking an afternoon walk in the lovely countryside.
Each day we would listen to an audio or watch a video on our topic. Some of this was unpublished material. We were able to turn our chairs towards the garden whilst listening to K speaking, which I found to be a soothing combination.
It was impossible, I observed, for most to keep listening intently for an hour or more, for the completion of each topic, for every talk includes many aspects of the teachings. What worked for me, was to watch where my interest sparked. One such example was the phrase : “Look at your problems as you would look at a flower.”
During the coffee break, I wandered into the walled garden* which, in early September, is still full of roses. This provided a perfect opportunity to test out the phrase. So, I deliberately studied a particularly beautiful rose by looking with no other agenda. Possibly ten minutes or so passed before I stirred and walked along the path ready for the next step, which was to look in the same way at a problem of this life. To my astonishment, the only problem became that there were no problems!
I searched quickly through memory banks, recalling my life back home in Canada where in each day some sort of problem arises daily. I could not recall that life. At first there was a bit of panic, as in, “this is a serious senior’s moment!” Still, nothing would come. Mind was quiet, empty. Returning to the group, which I had judged previously as ‘difficult,’ there was nothing to see but love and willingness. A deep quietness pervaded my looking and listening. This remained through subsequent travel days back to Canada, which seemed to be filled with ease. It still remains, underneath the inevitable problems of ‘my’ constructed and conditioned daily life. The one I would call ‘mine’ because that is what I identify with.
One can see that the problem with problems is that they are self-generated, arising as they do, from the partial solution to the last problem. This can be seen to be true whether it’s a small personal difficulty like say losing keys, or on a societal scale such as pollution of our planet or political turmoil.
“You cannot solve a problem through the means by which it was created.”
Beyond our meddling and our fretting, that which transcends and encompasses the whole, remains.
As a result of a study group on death I have come away with life. K says death and life and love are all one. That was revealed to me without any effort of ‘mine.’ The only thing necessary was attention. This was easy with roses which assail all the senses so fully that they practically demand our attention.
Now, post Brockwood, I am able to wholeheartedly recommend the suggested activity. When beset by a problem, go and look at a flower, a tree, a bird, the ocean. Just look!
Look until there is no one looking.
*NB. Walled gardens date back to medieval times. They were called “hortus conclusus.” Entering the garden was to enter sacred space. In the centre was usually a fountain, in this particular garden, a circular pagoda. Here resided Mary of the Christian tradition, symbolizing love and compassion. Mary was also associated with the rose. Possibly the hortus conclusus at Brockwood had its origins in the medieval period, for the land is ancient. As such it will have nurtured many inquirers and contemplatives.
LW
February Retreat with Caterina Maggi (from Italy)
![]()
CS – Allan, I propose that there is a locus of tranquility in one’s life while the well of silence is endless and can become an addictive drug; one could easily abide in that tranquility, but just a glimmer of that locus of tranquility is enough to live intelligently. I’d call it a middle path or a happy medium.
AA- Once a Buddhist teacher said “The Middle Way has no middle” meaning that it cannot be quantified or divided. The core of this endeavour is, of course, the display of one’s true nature, or, getting out of one’s own way so that one can see oneself clearly.
CS – I further propose that an intelligent recognition of destructive thought patterns is the core of spirituality.
AA – Yes.
CS – So, we seem to share a consensus but, is that all one needs spiritually?
AA – Yes, that, and, an unwavering resolve to abide in that locus of tranquility as a limitless proposition.
CS – Yes, there is no limit to how aware one can be because Awareness is timeless – it is in the realm of magic and expecting the unexpected; there is an Order that is timeless. However, impatience can be caused by a desire to abide or dwell permanently within that realm or in the locus of tranquility.
AA – St. Augustine said, “The reward of patience is patience”. Anxiety is not innately part of our natures, but tranquility is. Religion and psychoanalysis seem to be more interested in disease than in health.
CS- Yes, it seems so. I recently started to read the Dhammapada, but found I could not finish it…
Do you believe a transformation takes place in the brain as K. talks of to allow Intelligence to function?
AA- Yes, I believe it does.
CS – So, something has changed chemically in the neurons to allow a new way of thinking?
AA – Yes.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
CS – The mysticism of Egypt has always impressed me.
AA – The Sphinx has a lot of presence viewed from many different sides.
CS – Apparently, it came to a Pharaoh in a dream and that’s why it was built.
AA – Oh, really?
CS – I saw it as a child, but I do not recall my impression vividly.
AA – It is good to remember one’s impressions from childhood as they are often fresh.
CS – I shall look up my notes from our trip; it is incredible how pyramids show up in South America, as well, and, this whole business of an idea occurring simultaneously around the world (or a mutation).
AA – Yes.
CS – K. and Bohm talked of 5 or 6 transformed individuals being able to change the world. Why not 2 or 3?
AA – Why not?
[These are personal impressions of dialogues with Professor Allan W. Anderson printed with his permission given on May 23, 2010; in no way does Chanda Siddoo-Atwal (CS) purport that these are verbatim discussions, but only excerpts recalled after conversations in which she has tried to “pluck out” their essence from her notes taken during these talks. It shall be serialized in its entirety as a tribute to his life and work in the coming issues of The Swanwick Star. This is the sixth serial installment from a compilation called “The Bird in the Verandah”]
CS (April 11, 2009)

With Prof. P. Krishna and David Moody (May Retreat)
Reflections on the Self Dialogue Group
Meeting October 20th, 2019
Present: 8 members: 3 apologies
There have been a number of absences throughout the summer so that some members were meeting again after 4 months, others were not present. The fluctuating nature of the group was commented on along with a question around a sense of separation and how to become reconnected?
Lynne opened the group by commenting on and reading from the first two pages of the chapter on “Freedom,” where K declares that “Freedom does not imply choice.”Applying this to our mutual situation of voting in the federal election tomorrow it seemed pertinent to look at his statement “ You choose according to your temperament, your desire, your pleasure. You are faced with the question of whom to listen to, whom to follow.” Whom to chose indeed!
It was suggested from the outset that we cannot really dialogue about Freedom, our topic of the month and last chapter of the book, as though it were, in itself, a topic. We can only look at any situation, for example, the election, and ask if we are approaching it out of freedom, for K is clear that freedom is at the beginning.
When are we not free? This involved again going into conditioning.
Some members of the group, rather painfully and slowly, took this up as others listened. It was not clear that many had given much attention to the chapter or using it for self inquiry as was the original intention of this group.
We returned many times to the need for paying attention in the immediacy. Are we currently in a state of separation or in a state of inclusion/communion? If not, who it not?
Is it possible to attend to all points of view, seeing that every one is only partial? What is our experience of the whole? Does action arise all by itself from that?
It was acknowledged that Freedom is synonymous with unravelling Conditioning, otherwise we assess things from our conditioned and partial standpoint, negating other views in the process and taking ‘sides.’ There were comments abut the nature of partisan political rallies.
We moved to the topic of confusion in making choices, any choices, and K’s point of view on this, ie “is it possible to be still in the midst of confusion ?”was gone into with examples. To attend to confusion is not in itself confused.
Two other members drew our attention to sections of the chapter which were of interest and which we looked at.
As well the topic of the nature of conditioning, including biological conditioning was suggested and augmented the dialogue.
The main understanding today was that freedom could only be now, in the act of complete attention, which means communion. What is it that separates us, here and now and within society? Examples were given of faulty attempts at inclusion ie with regard to sexual fluidity, which, in the end, through multiplicity of choices ( 72 now reported on facebook!) end up creating further separation and alienation. Similarly with alternative pronouns.
Much of our looking oscillated between the world at large, ie society and our own ‘world’ including presence in the group on this Sunday afternoon. Everything which we can comment on in the world can be also seen in ourselves. There is no greater take away than this!
LW



[Photos courtesy of LT, 2019]
I loved staying at KECC, watching lots of videos, reading and taking long walks. The immensity of the sea and the soaring mountains naturally create space in the mind, silencing the chatter and leading to quiet contemplation and enquiry into the nature of human brain/human life and its function, role in the immensity of the universal or cosmic order. Clearly, the conditioned brain, to borrow K.’s terminology or the words of the Buddha, who had also pointed towards the conditioned state of human existence, clearly this brain is incapable of grasping the immensity of another state of mind or consciousness.
Both, the Buddha and Krishnamurti have unequivocally stated that there is another dimension or a state of being, or whatever words one may use, however, unfortunately, it is not in our limited, time-bound, narrow, self-centered consciousness. We don’t know what it is. And our brains, as they are now, can never grasp it unless the physical structure of the brain itself changes. Which means total insight. I don’t think that one can have partial insights into the matters of existence. One can have more clarity and rationality, but partial insights here and there into the matters of life and death, love, truth and beauty, comic order and supreme intelligence, are not possible, as far as I can see. Or they are not possible as long as time/thought, which is the make-up of the ego, are operating.
Here is a radiant statement Krishnamurti made when talking to KFI people in India:
“You always want me to come into your world and discuss your problems. But I have been saying all along to come into my world, where there are no problems. But you won’t do that.”
I wonder why we don’t do that? Are we so heavily conditioned? After all, the world is in such a crisis: a crisis beyond all crises! The Earth may be uninhabitable in twenty, fifty years. So the only thing to do is to actually change the structure of the brain and bring about a cosmic shift or go on …!
ER (Fall 2019)

My Aunt (Dr. Jagdis Kaur Siddoo) was one of the most incredible women I have ever met and one of the great female influences of my life. She and my Mother (Dr. Sarjit Kaur Siddoo) were the first and second persons of Indo-Canadian origin to graduate from medical school in Canada, respectively (University of Toronto). In fact, it was a trend throughout her life – my Aunt was never afraid to be the first to do something. She also had a passion for philosophy and Krishnamurti as evidenced in her book “Listening is the Guru” about how the two sisters started Wolf Lake School, which I attended as a child. She enjoyed hiking and had a keen love of the outdoors that she imparted to all those around her. There is no doubt that Aunt “Jackie” was a veritable force in all our lives and really molded everything we did.

Like my Aunt, I started composing music based on birdsongs and many were the fond discussions we had about our avian friends. In fact, in the evenings near the end, I tried to amuse her by telling her a new bird story based on my encounters with birds during the day. She seemed to relish these stories whether it was about my resident woodpecker, Woodie, who would wake me up each morning by knocking on the chimney or Hummie, the hummingbird, who came every Spring looking for the red hummingbird feeder that had not been there for many years! However, I assured her that I would get a new feeder for him this year. Luckily, I was able to complete my latest opera dedicated to her in time for her birthday this year and have a classical string quartet perform it at her party.
Every new interest of hers was taken up with great energy and enthusiasm like her study of the Sanskrit language, which she mastered in her seventies, and, of course, gardening was always a favourite hobby. She excelled at everything she touched and enjoyed the detective stories which I read to her from time to time. Probably, most of all (even though she did not shy away from disciplining naughty children), she was fun, fun, fun to the end with a zest for life that I shall never forget!
CS
Before coming to this Second ‘You Are the World’ Conference at KECC, I’ve been asking myself what I have done to embody some of the things we talked about last time in my life over the past year & this is what I came up with:
*Continuing to live peacefully without confrontations
*Working at creating green spaces for wildlife & plant life
*Using less plastic & paper; using only the resources one needs; cutting back on excess in business, as well
*Promoting peaceful means of communication on social media
*Promoting a ban on nuclear & depleted uranium weapons; teaching others about their negative biological effects on social media and in co-authored books
*Advocating remediation of radioactive contamination on social media
*Respecting Nature & trying to help preserve other species (one can do this just by having a single birdfeeder in one’s garden – it’s perceived as a ‘safe space’ & it’s amazing the baby birds and squirrels I’ve found myself babysitting!)
When I asked a friend who participated in the conference last year the same question, he said:
*Living a peaceful life without conflicts
*Leading a simple life
*Not using more than he needs;
*Not having more things than he requires to exist
*Caring for others & Nature
Even before we can start talking about cooperating and begin to curb the current climate-change crisis, it is clear to me as a scientist that there are certain basic issues we must address like using war as a means of ‘trying’ to solve our problems. With the advent of biological, chemical, nuclear, thermonuclear, depleted uranium, and, possibly, meteorological weapons, war must cease altogether in order for there to be a serious dialogue, cooperation among nations, and any meaningful change in the world.
So, I’ve crafted The World Peace Treaty & would like to put it forward for everyone’s input as part of this dialogue
- No country should invade any other & all nations should agree to peaceful coexistence
- If one country invades another, it should be boycotted by all other nations & subjected to rigorous economic sanctions
- One country should not be able to start a war against another, but if it does, it should be ostracized by all other nations & all diplomatic relations should be severed
- State-sponsored acts of terrorism, sabotage, or civil war should be punished in the same way
- No country should be able to use nuclear, thermonuclear, depleted uranium or any other type of bombs against another country, but if it does, then it should pay full reparations
- Chemical, biological, and meteorological weapons should be illegal
- Nuclear testing should be banned since it contributes to climate-change
*Note: As a result of the First You are the World conference in 2018, many serious environmental issues that are confronting the planet were discussed. This year, the Canadian climate-change authority, Dr. Peter Carter, was the invited speaker and he touched on various topics during the retreat. Historically, we are currently in the Sixth Mass Extinction in which many species are being wiped out and certain experts predict that humans will be extinct by the end of the century. The last Fifth Mass Extinction famously wiped out the dinosaurs. We also learned about an interesting new movement of teenage climate activists like Greta Thunberg, who are shaking up the world of complacent politicians. As a young man, Peter was involved in the nuclear disarmament movement, which is still a relevant topic, today.
CS (September 2019)

Musical Interlude organized by Chanda (November Retreat)