“To discover what is beyond time, thought must come to an end” …(Link to full K quote) Last evening I enjoyed the new movie “Theory of Everything” – the life story of Stephen Hawking. An extraordinary love story, with some extraordinary acting and cinematography. The scientific aspects of his quest to find the beginning of time are kind of in the background. This whole business of time and space as illusion has been known for centuries by sages and mystics, however, it appears science is still trying to “get it,” so to speak, using thought and thinking…which is all that time is. But the beginning of the universe and time simply cannot be located by time (thought). It’s only a matter of time before science runs out of molecules or thought. “Physics tells us that time functions relative to the one that is observing time. It would appear that every last particle of the observable stellar universe, even at the smallest quantum level, seems to function and have its basis in never-present time. Even at the level of energy, every bit of the observable universe appears to be vibrating, moving; it never stops passing in on in time, or not-being, to genuinely be. It means the entire universe never is present. What’s more, it takes time to observe the universe. And, the entire functioning of the very human, thinking mind that claims to observe that universe has its basis only in never-present time. Therefore that observing mind never is present, or being. Einstein demonstrated that time doesn’t move at a fixed rate, but seems to move at a speed “relative” to the one who is observing time. Now, let’s take a look at being or presence. From the standpoint of being, one now can see that time is not relative. Time takes on an “absolute” status again, but in a new way. From the premise of being, time isn’t relative to anything because in being, time never occurs! Being’s changeless presence precludes “the arrow of time.” Just as infinity has no spatial measurement, neither does being. There is absolutely no space or dimension in being, in the present. Being, the present is not present at all points in physical space. Being does not “fill” or occupy space. Why? To speak of movement in space, thus time, is to speak of what-is-not-being, instead of what-is-being. Being, the present, is the absence of time, which is also the absence of measureable space or dimension. As only the infinite-present, pure being, is what is being, and is the absence of time, then it does not permit or co-exist with time. Thus the infinite-present is not between past and future, but is the utter preclusion of past and future, all time. That which is truly present – being, infinity – involves no time, no space, no matter. As being is time-less, space-less, quality-less – then, being, like infinity, is irreducible. So, being makes it clear that the last irreducible “something” we’ve been seeking isn’t a quantum particle, string, or other form, but is Being, itself. The fact that infinity, being, is measureless, of course means it is un-observable and un-testable – and therefore unacceptable in scientific experimentation. The infinity of Being is clean and simple – an eternal absolute, standing present outside of time, cause and effect. Ever-elusive as being seems, science should not leave it completely out of consideration, just because being isn’t observable or measureable, or has no form. To be reality, reality has to be. Not to belabour the point, but if something isn’t specifically present, if it isn’t really being, then it certainly isn’t being real. Whatever the “ultimate reality” of life or existence is, does it not have to truly exist and be present? Whether one expects “ultimate reality” should have an incredibly small sub-atomic form, a mathematical form, or even a mental, theoretical form – to say reality has not yet been found, is saying no form has been found. While science may claim we are not yet able to say what reality is, it can be said with certainty that reality is. Again, by definition, in order to be reality, reality has to be. So it can be said for certain that reality must be that which is being. The fact that being has no measureable form means reality has no form. Being, thus reality, is the absence of time – and this shows in another way why reality has no form. In time-less reality, no time passes in which anything could be formed! No time passes in which any form could be discovered – or even considered un-discovered! One implication of Godel’s famous incompleteness theorem is that it is possible for something to be un-provable, yet true – and that points directly at being, infinity. Being, Infinity, can’t be proven mathematically or by data, for true infinity exists outside of numbers, formulas and data. Infinity exists outside of time. Yet un-provable infinity, being, is what truly is, or what is true. One simply cannot get around this, for if one attempts to say there is no being, one first has to be in order to even say that!” Excerpted from “The New Infinity” by P Dziuban
January UVic Spiritual Awakening Meetup
/in Event Summaries /by David BruneauIt was my pleasure to organize and facilitate the January UVic Spiritual Awakening Meetup. 21 Awakeners attended, and the discussion was very meaningful. I’m always pleasantly surprised by the insight that people bring to such gatherings. We explored approaches to overcoming self-limiting thoughts, with a special focus on beliefs and the meaning and practice of mindfulness. The evening included a Krishnamurti quote from The Book of Life, followed by a short Mooji video clip called “Unhappy Is Just A Thought”. After some discussion, we then looked at a definition of mindfulness, and watched a relevant clip featuring yogi and Buddhist teacher Michael Stone, who also happens to be from Vancouver. I have received some great feedback from enthusiastic Awakeners, which will help make this an even more meaningful and engaging gathering in the near future. We’re certainly off to a good start, and I’m looking forward to the next UVic Spiritual Awakening Meetup. Here is the K quote that was featured in the Meetup: “One can see how political and religious beliefs, national and various other types of beliefs, do separate people, do create conflict, confusion, and antagonism which is an obvious fact; and yet we are unwilling to give them up… One can see, obviously, that belief is separating people, creating intolerance; is it possible to live without belief? One can find that out only if one can study oneself in relationship to a belief. Is it possible to live in this world without a belief? Not change beliefs, not substitute one belief for another, but be entirely free from all beliefs, so that one meets life anew each minute? This, after all, is the truth: to have the capacity of meeting everything anew, from moment to moment, without the conditioning reaction of the past, so that there is not the cumulative effect which acts as a barrier between oneself and that which is.” J. Krishnamurti, The Book of Life
Weekend Events at the Centre
/in Event Summaries /by David BruneauKrishnamurti Study Group Saturday, January 3, 2015. The group began its study of a second book by J. Krishnamurti entitled “The First and Last Freedom”. Seven people attended the meeting which began with some reading from the first chapter. The focus was on the difficulty of communicating and of meeting on the same level at the same time. K emphasizes the importance of listening without prejudice or pre-formulations so that one is open to what is being said and may be able to see the truth or falseness of it in the moment. We must be aware of ourselves as we actually are and not as we would like to be. Group members were free in interject at any time and a good deal of discussion was triggered by the reading. It was suggested that if judgements do arise, which will usually happen, then one can simply notice them and thereby neutralize their power to distort the inquiry. The discussion naturally flowed from one subject to related ones and participants were very much engaged in the exploration. The meetings on the first and third Saturdays of the month will continue to focus on the same book. Inquiry Sunday January 4, 2015 Nine people were in attendance for the morning session in which the inquiry approach of Rupert Spira was presented via an excellent video interview of Rupert in conversation with Chris Hebard. The two explored the book “The Transparency of Things”, Chris asking pointed questions about what Rupert is pointing to. It was an excellent experiential journey, a looking at the nature of our present moment experience and questioning many of our assumptions about the reality of separateness. Rupert is masterful at guiding people to an experience and understanding which undermines the assumption of duality. We will be continuing to explore this DVD in future Inquiry Sunday meetings. The afternoon session began with a half hour video from the “Beyond Myth and Tradition” series produced by Evelyn Blau in which excerpts of talks by Krishnamurti are presented on a particular subject, in this case “Change”. Krishnamurti himself is usually very passionate in these clips and urges us to be equally passionate ourselves in looking into the issue of what he says is a necessary change in the structure of society which can only come about when we ourselves transform our own consciousness through insight or direct seeing of our ways of thinking and behaviour. These challenging talks by K always seem to stimulate lively discussion following the video presentation. We will continue with further episodes from the same series in the coming months.
Saturday Event at the Centre
/in Event Summaries /by David BruneauKrishnamurti Study Group Saturday, December 20, 2014. We brought the year to an end for the study group with a feature length video about K’s life and teachings entitled “With A Silent Mind”. There were some beautiful quotations about silence and meditation combined with nature scenes. Old film clips of K included his speaking at the 1929 Ommen gathering where he dissolved the Order of the Star and there were quite a number of interesting interviews with people who had known K and been influenced by his teachings and presence. Various viewpoints about his teachings were presented in a refreshingly honest way. After the video there was a discussion of some of the points raised in the film and of the group participants’ own experience with Krishnamurti. In the new year we will begin the study of the K book The First and Last Freedom.
“New Beginnings”
/in Event Summaries /by David BruneauToday I received an invite to attend an event to celebrate the what is termed “Winter Solstace” or new beginning or rebirth of a new world. From here there is no need to attach any significance to the calendar as far as “New Beginnings” are concerned. I am reminded of K’s talk. “The first step is the last step… … The first step is the last step. The first step is to perceive, perceive what you are thinking, perceive your ambition, perceive your anxiety, your loneliness, your despair, this extraordinary sense of sorrow, perceive it, without any condemnation, justification, without wishing it to be different. Just to perceive it, as it is. When you perceive it as it is, then there is a totally different kind of action taking place, and that action is the final action. Right? That is, when you perceive something as being false or as being true, that perception is the final action, which is the final step. Now listen to it. I perceive the falseness of following somebody else, somebody else’s instruction—Krishna, Buddha, Christ, it does not matter who it is. I see, there is the perception of the truth that following somebody is utterly false. Because your reason, your logic and everything points out how absurd it is to follow somebody. Now that perception is the final step, and when you have perceived, you leave it, forget it, because the next minute you have to perceive anew, which is again the final step.” AND Here is my reply to the invitation… Thank you so much for the kind invitation! Wishing everybody all the best in your apparent journey. From here, there is no calendar to a “New Beginning.” It is ever-fresh and shining in each apparent moment of Existence as I Am. I Am is synonymous with Love. It doesn’t come and go…or even begin or end. And Love is all that truly Exists. It shines in the Heart as… Peace.
Cause and Effect Crusades
/in Event Summaries /by David BruneauKrishnamurti states in today’s quote: “Why need you have an ideal of non-violence?” “You have been brought up, most unfortunately, on ideals. Ideals are just words. They have no meaning whatsoever, they have no substance. They are just the barren children of a vain, thoughtless mind! You have been brought up on the ideal of nonviolence. You go around preaching all over the world nonviolence. Nonviolence is the ideal…(read the whole quote). As I am just re-entering the world of Facebook, one thing that stands out is the number of “issues” and “causes” people appear to be involved in. There seem to be a myriad of “save the world” or “help make the world a better place” crusades. Although on the surface this activity might seem noble and spiritually correct, the underlying motives appear to be “causing” as much division and hatred, conflict and separation between “us.” And hence, non-acceptance of the way “things” (including people) actually are…at least in this “picture” or dream world. I remember attending a David Hawkins lecture in Sedona. One of the questions from the floor was something like… “What should I do to help others become more spiritual?” Hawkins responded… “If you are required to save the world, you will be notified.” From “my” viewpoint, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anybody or any activity that appears to happen in day-to-day life. Nothing to change. And certainly nobody to fix. “I have no idea what’s going on, and I wouldn’t know what to do about it if I did.” – George Carlin
Satguru vs. Guru
/in Event Summaries /by David BruneauMy Facebook sites are becoming quite interesting. Today I was corresponding with a Beautiful Indian woman who lives in Tiruvanamali. I had asked if she knew or had visited Ramesh Balsekar while he was still alive. Her response was that she had not but that a friend had and found him a very powerful guru. But to her way of thinking there were lots of gurus but that Ramana Maharshi was the only “satguru.” This is my reply… Dear (…….), Thank you so much for writing and expressing your point of view as regards the guru vs. the satguru. And I in no way mean any disrespect to those beliefs. From my perspective, all of “us” are products of the society and era in which we are brought up. And our bodies, beliefs and conditioning seem to be a complete fabrication of the “mind” and its “dream.” And from here, this also applies to any so-called “holy ones”. As shown by Maharshi’s belief in the reincarnation of his cow and pet peacock. I also recall Ramana expressing that each of “us” is our own satguru, which is more in line with my thinking. Like George Carlin, J and UG Krishnamurti, I too, tend to shy away from any perceived “authority,” whether it is clothed in a loin cloth or a police uniform.
Weekend Mooji Retreat
/in Event Summaries /by David BruneauMooji Retreat December 12 – 14, 2014 This weekend event featured video showings of a retreat with Mooji held in Zmar, Portugal, in May of 2014, The opening Friday night session was attended by seven people and after some heart-felt expressions about what had brought them to the Swanwick Centre, we watched the introductory satsang with Mooji, followed by a silent sit and guided meditation. Some of the participants at the Portugal venue were obviously ready to jump right in and some serious questions and inquiry took place very quickly. On Saturday we were joined by two more participants and watched a second satsang (in two parts) and had two more silent sits and guided meditations as well as a dialogue session during which people shared their understanding and experience of Mooji’s teaching and how it is relevant in their lives. An introductory video was also shown about Krishnamurti’s life and teachings. There was time during the day for outdoor walks on the property and rest time. In the evening one more half of a satsang was shown. Sunday started off with a satang in the morning and there was another one in the afternoon, with a period for sharing before lunch. The retreat was essentially conducted in silence until lunch on Sunday, after which participants elected to lift the silence but to remain “present” while speaking. The retreat was brought to a completion by late afternoon. The atmosphere of the weekend was one of serious but joyful contemplation and sharing. Mooji’s pointings were, as usual, very focused in asking people to look again and again at their actual experience and to ask “who” or “what” the experiencer is in fact. One of his main emphases is to help people to see that the “I-me” is nothing but a fabrication of thought and that we are suffering from a false sense of self which then suffers from ideas it has about itself. At times the conversations with seekers were very humorous, at times quite fierce and challenging. The participants at Swanwick enjoyed tremendously the explorations of what we are and what we take ourselves to be and reported some significant shifts in their understanding and “seeing”.
Weekend Events at the Centre
/in Event Summaries /by David BruneauKrishnamurti Study Group Saturday, December 6, 2014 This was the concluding session in the study of Freedom From the Known by J. Krishnamurti. All five participants had been attending the meetings on a regular basis over the past year. They were asked to share, if they so desired, their understanding of the essence for them of K’s teachings and how the teachings have impacted their lives. After some minutes for quiet contemplation of the question, participants shared as they were moved. The quality of the sharing was quite sensitive and profound and the expressions of how the teachings are alive in people’s daily experience of themselves were very touching and significant. The last session of the year on December 20 will include a film about Krishnamurti entitled “With A Silent Mind” and the new year will begin with the study of the K book “The First and Last Freedom”. Inquiry Sunday Sunday, December 7, 2014 The morning session, attended by six people, began with a video showing of a talk given by Rupert Spira at the Science and Non-duality Conference in California this year. Everyone seemed to feel that the talk was brilliant and valuable for their own process of self inquiry. One of the main emphases of the talk was the difference it makes to place attention on the knowing awareness by which objects are known rather than to identify with and give importance to the objects themselves. Rupert led us in a clear and logical exploration of consciousness itself as we know it. The video was followed by a discussion of its meaning for the participants. It was mentioned that Rupert and Krishnamurti are essentially pointing to the same state of attention or awareness. In the afternoon there was a showing of the video “The Mirror of Relationship” from the Evelyn Blau series “Beyond Myth and Tradition”. Krishnamurti speaks in these excerpts from his talks of the power of being aware of ourselves in relationship and the insight that arises as we look at ourselves in this mirror. He emphasizes that when we create images of each other there is no real relationship. In the following dialogue the question was asked, “How can we prevent these images from interfering?” The discussion focused on the need to be attentive to the images as they arise so that they dissolve in the presence of awareness. This was explored in some detail.
It’s only a matter of time.
/in Event Summaries /by David Bruneau“To discover what is beyond time, thought must come to an end” …(Link to full K quote) Last evening I enjoyed the new movie “Theory of Everything” – the life story of Stephen Hawking. An extraordinary love story, with some extraordinary acting and cinematography. The scientific aspects of his quest to find the beginning of time are kind of in the background. This whole business of time and space as illusion has been known for centuries by sages and mystics, however, it appears science is still trying to “get it,” so to speak, using thought and thinking…which is all that time is. But the beginning of the universe and time simply cannot be located by time (thought). It’s only a matter of time before science runs out of molecules or thought. “Physics tells us that time functions relative to the one that is observing time. It would appear that every last particle of the observable stellar universe, even at the smallest quantum level, seems to function and have its basis in never-present time. Even at the level of energy, every bit of the observable universe appears to be vibrating, moving; it never stops passing in on in time, or not-being, to genuinely be. It means the entire universe never is present. What’s more, it takes time to observe the universe. And, the entire functioning of the very human, thinking mind that claims to observe that universe has its basis only in never-present time. Therefore that observing mind never is present, or being. Einstein demonstrated that time doesn’t move at a fixed rate, but seems to move at a speed “relative” to the one who is observing time. Now, let’s take a look at being or presence. From the standpoint of being, one now can see that time is not relative. Time takes on an “absolute” status again, but in a new way. From the premise of being, time isn’t relative to anything because in being, time never occurs! Being’s changeless presence precludes “the arrow of time.” Just as infinity has no spatial measurement, neither does being. There is absolutely no space or dimension in being, in the present. Being, the present is not present at all points in physical space. Being does not “fill” or occupy space. Why? To speak of movement in space, thus time, is to speak of what-is-not-being, instead of what-is-being. Being, the present, is the absence of time, which is also the absence of measureable space or dimension. As only the infinite-present, pure being, is what is being, and is the absence of time, then it does not permit or co-exist with time. Thus the infinite-present is not between past and future, but is the utter preclusion of past and future, all time. That which is truly present – being, infinity – involves no time, no space, no matter. As being is time-less, space-less, quality-less – then, being, like infinity, is irreducible. So, being makes it clear that the last irreducible “something” we’ve been seeking isn’t a quantum particle, string, or other form, but is Being, itself. The fact that infinity, being, is measureless, of course means it is un-observable and un-testable – and therefore unacceptable in scientific experimentation. The infinity of Being is clean and simple – an eternal absolute, standing present outside of time, cause and effect. Ever-elusive as being seems, science should not leave it completely out of consideration, just because being isn’t observable or measureable, or has no form. To be reality, reality has to be. Not to belabour the point, but if something isn’t specifically present, if it isn’t really being, then it certainly isn’t being real. Whatever the “ultimate reality” of life or existence is, does it not have to truly exist and be present? Whether one expects “ultimate reality” should have an incredibly small sub-atomic form, a mathematical form, or even a mental, theoretical form – to say reality has not yet been found, is saying no form has been found. While science may claim we are not yet able to say what reality is, it can be said with certainty that reality is. Again, by definition, in order to be reality, reality has to be. So it can be said for certain that reality must be that which is being. The fact that being has no measureable form means reality has no form. Being, thus reality, is the absence of time – and this shows in another way why reality has no form. In time-less reality, no time passes in which anything could be formed! No time passes in which any form could be discovered – or even considered un-discovered! One implication of Godel’s famous incompleteness theorem is that it is possible for something to be un-provable, yet true – and that points directly at being, infinity. Being, Infinity, can’t be proven mathematically or by data, for true infinity exists outside of numbers, formulas and data. Infinity exists outside of time. Yet un-provable infinity, being, is what truly is, or what is true. One simply cannot get around this, for if one attempts to say there is no being, one first has to be in order to even say that!” Excerpted from “The New Infinity” by P Dziuban
“Robert, you are in denial!”
/in Event Summaries /by David BruneauA few years back while I was playing the role of “Lord of the Lodge” at one of the better known west coast retreat centres, one of the staff – after reading ‘my’ book – said, “Robert, I think you are in denial!” She never actually made it clear as to what I was in denial of, but never the less, it seemed to spark an internal inquiry. After a lot of pondering, the only thing that I could come up with was that, yes indeed, I was denying the Truth of who or what I Am. I was continuing to strive to become “awake” like I believed the teachers whose pointings I had been following – Maharshi, Nisargadatta, Krishnamurti, Eckhart, Francis Lucille, and a few others. For a while, Mooji was my only teacher and although his basic instruction is that “you have nothing to do,” and “to remain as the Self.” It seems the mind was still trying to “get it” somehow. Robert WAS in denial! Anyway, this is just sort of an intro into what follows. It seems that whenever I am in the company of “like-minded” folks…like this afternoon, and the conversation appears to be on a real superficial level, with lots of “because” or “they should or shouldn’t,” or giving ‘personal’ credit (or blame), cause and effect, etc. etc., this character, “me,” seems to take on the role of a Zen stick and wants to keep reminding them that they are acting like they are in denial. Denial of who they really are. And sometimes it might appear to be abrupt and that I am being like the non-dual police. It might appear to be like that, but it really comes from a place of Love. Love of My Self in a temporary disguise as my friend sitting across the table. It’s like “come-on get Real, or stop-it! Stop denying what You know you are. Start Being It! Walk the talk!” “You know You are this Magnificence. This, Unconditional Love. You never were this dream character that appears to be in this fantasy called daily life and living!” “So, snap out of it!” (sort of hitting them across the back of the head with a Zen stick.) But again, all of what appears to be confrontational is not that at all! Even though I know there is no “they” or “them” or any one actually saying all the gibberish (or reacting to it!) love and compassion seem to arise. Instead of the statement made by Paul Heddermans and others, “We are all in recovery.” How about, “We are all in denial!” Has a different flavour…no? It’s like ignoring what and who I Am (and have always been) as opposed to a belief that there every was one to recover. Or, believing one is sick and needs to recover to become well or whole again. As opposed to denying the One ever became ill and has always been all the Wellness there is! But of course the One I Am cannot do either…It just IS! There are 4 quotes on Denial on the Official K Site… http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/krishnamurti-teachings/daily-quote-list.php?t=Denial