Krishnamurti Study Group

  Krishnamurti Study Group Saturday, June 20, 2015   Six people gathered to explore chapter 6 in The First and Last Freedom by J. Krishnamurti.  The topic of the chapter is “Belief” and K begins by stating that he is not attacking beliefs but rather questioning why we seem to need them and what our motives are for holding beliefs.  Is fear at the bottom of our need for beliefs, and is it possible to live entirely without beliefs, which separate people and create conflict in the world?  What are we if we do not identify with any beliefs?  After reading a portion of the text the group engage in a focused inquiry into the nature of belief and the challenge of letting go of deeply held assumptions such as the idea that we  need to be in control of our lives.  The level of inquiry seemed to be quite deep and participants found it challenging – but worthwhile – to really look at and be with the issues raised.

Consciousness, Pure and Simple

The past lives in our minds. It dictates our experience of the present from a very powerful position, operating as the very self we identify as “I”. This I is like an impostor from within our own consciousness, claiming our life experiences for its own and distorting them based on its conditioning. We see the world through the lens of this I, with its web of mental associations that colour our perception and have us constantly judging and labeling everything in our experience—including ourselves—according to the past. This I is constantly reinforcing and substantiating itself by projecting memories and thoughts into our consciousness that keep it front and center in the present moment. When we observe our thoughts, we can see how the stories in our minds almost always revolve around “I”, “me”, “mine”, and variations of “me and you”, “me and them” and “me and that”. We’ve come to take this dualistic internal dialogue for granted, unconscious of the fact that this drama inside is purely mental fabrication, including the I operating at the center of it all. Isolation, division and conflict are inherent qualities of this internal dynamic, and it causes a great deal of suffering in many people’s lives. The mind is such a powerful tool, so immensely powerful that consciousness itself is easily mesmerized by it, by its own creation. That is really what we are though: consciousness, pure and simple. When we take a good look at ourselves in the present moment, if we can differentiate between what is a projection of the past and what is actually here in the present, we might see that the self of the mind does not really exist. Instead, what is here is something formless, clear and indefinable, free from the past and full of the present. It is something that is both inherently whole and empty at the same time. All the commotion inside arises in a space that is naturally still and silent. Looking inside and seeing these as qualities of your true nature creates the opportunity to shift from a state of narrow identification with the “I” thought (and all its projections), to a state of openness, non-reaction and inner peace. Who we think we are is a complicated drama of memories and emotions that is often butting heads with reality, but what we really are exists only in the present, and is simplicity itself. Our conditioning is deeply rooted, and so seeing this may not transform us immediately, but with continued awareness we might finally shed the bondage of the past and find the peace that is always right here, right where we are. JR “There is a watching of the past as it goes by, but not occupation with the past. So the mind is free to observe and not to choose. Where there is choice in this movement of the river of memory, there is occupation, and the moment the mind is occupied, it is caught in the past: and when the mind is occupied with the past, it is incapable of seeing something real, true, new, original, uncontaminated. A mind that is occupied with the past – the past is the whole consciousness that says, `this is good; `that is right; `this is bad; `this is mine; `this is not mine’ – can never know the Real. But the mind unoccupied can receive that which is not known, which is the unknown. This is not an extraordinary state of some yogi, some saint. Just observe your own mind; how direct and simple it is. See how your mind is occupied. And the answer, with what the mind is occupied, will give you the understanding of the past, and therefore the freedom from the past.” -J. Krishnamurti, Collected Works Volume 7 Bombay, 4th March 1953

A Zen Gatha

Yesterday, I attended David Bruneau’s video showing of one of J Krishnamurti’s talks on what seems like K’s favourite topic “fear.” The discussion that ensued after brought to light that perhaps the most primary and widespread fear is the fear of death and it brought up thoughts of a famous Zen Master on his deathbed… It used to be the custom of Zen masters on their deathbeds to compose a gatha – a poetic condensation of the insights of a long and dedicated spiritual life, a final comment on life itself and impending death. It is reported that one famous Master who was very near death summoned his followers to his bed and asked for a paper and pencil. He then scribbled something and handed it back to one of the now expectant  elders who read it and seemed very confused.  The note said… “I don’t want to die.” After passing it around to the others, he said that he didn’t understand this gatha and again handed the master a piece of paper and pencil. The old master scribbled again and handed it back…. “I really, really don’t want to die!”  

Victoria Video and Dialogue Event

Krishnamurti Video Event in Victoria Sunday, June 14, 2015 The subject of the video and dialogue event at The Church of Truth in Victoria this month was “Dealing with Difficult Emotions”. Eight people attended the meeting. We began with an excerpt of an Ojai talk by Krishnamurti in which he focused mainly on fear but applied the pointers to being with anger or any other emotion. The video was supplemented with a handout from Freedom from the Known, Chapter 5. Both the video and the reading were specifically inquiring into how we look at fear. Do we look as a separate observer, or do we realize that we are not in fact separate from the fear? When the duality collapses our relationship with fear is transmuted and the issue dissolves. There was a great interest in investigating further by means of group dialogue in which participants were asked to share (if they wanted) what their understanding was, how they look at difficult emotions, and what they might have learned from the video, reading and discussion. After a tea break we watched a short video of Rupert Spira on the topic of going into the heart of an emotion. He took the example of feeling hurt by what someone has said and explored step by step a process of inquiring into exactly who or what is feeling hurt. He showed that the entity who is hurt is nothing but a fictional character created by imagination. Naturally the whole problem is transformed by this kind of insight, and the group found his presentation extremely clear and useful. After a little more discussion we watched a clip of Eckhart Tolle, again focusing on psychological fear. Eckhart gave a number of practical suggestions for dealing with anxiety and fear which seemed a helpful addition to the previous material. The group was quite fully engaged and it always took some energy to rein in the discussion and bring each part of the session to a close.

Weekend Events at the Centre

  Krishnamurti Study Group Saturday, June 6, 2015   Five of us gathered on a beautiful Saturday afternoon to continue with the study of Chapter 5 in the Krishnamurti book The First and Last Freedom.  The chapter explores the subject of Action and Idea and proposes the question of acting without any concepts or thinking, all of which comes from the past and is inadequate as a response to the present moment.  K states in the text that the only true action is that of love, which is not of the past or of thought.   Love cannot be thought about or brought about by the mind.  K’s statements were a catalyst for some meaningful inquiry and direct experience on the part of the participants.  What he was pointing to became more or less self evident as we explored it in our own experience and even looked into that which is beyond experience. Inquiry Sunday Sunday, June 7, 2015 For the morning session on Sunday, a video was shown about Nisargadatta Maharaj and his teachings.  It was produced by Stephen Wolinsky, one of Nisargadatta’s better known Western devotees.  The five participants who met for the session all considered to film to be excellent and very useful.  Many people who had known Nisargadatta and been influenced by him were interviewed and archival clips of N speaking with seekers were interspersed.  His teaching is very uncompromising and demanding, and very similar to Krishnamurti’s in that way.   There was some discussion afterwards about the ideas presented in the video and the implications for our spiritual unfoldment.  Five people were in attendance for this event. In the afternoon we watched part of an Ojai talk by Krishnamurti on fear and read a handout on the same topic from Freedom From the Known.  In these talks K was focusing in particular on how we look at fear.  Do we look as an observer separate from the fear or do we see that we are the fear and not in fact separate from it?  The group inquired into this issue in some depth and shared our understandings and questions regarding the seeing of the fact and the implications of such seeing.  We were able to sit out on the lawn in lovely weather, which always seems to support an expansiveness of perceiving and being.

The Bondage of Control: To Control Is To Be Controlled

Can freedom come from control? The very nature of bondage is control, and yet most of us seek freedom through greater and greater control in our lives. Is there a link between psychological suffering and the pervasive need to feel that we are in control? History repeats itself, every single day. When we watch ourselves—when we observe our thoughts and actions on a daily basis—the degree to which we live according to certain patterns becomes glaringly obvious. Most of us take these patterns for granted, or are not even conscious of them, and so we’re not aware of the power they have in our lives. Going a step further, what we understand to be free will and personal agency are deeply governed by these patterns—which are essentially expressions of our conditioning—to the point that we might question the validity of these notions as they are commonly understood. At first, this understanding can be disconcerting; it can be scary to think that we are not really in control of our own lives, but this realization also has the power to release us from a great deal of confusion and suffering. Indeed, the notion of control itself may one of the most deeply embedded illusions in the human mind, and sages throughout history have pointed this out to help us let go of something that causes an immense amount of psychological suffering. This awareness can be freeing, having the power to lead us to a transformative understanding of ourselves. The suffering that arises from our patterns and conditioning is closely tied to misunderstanding. Maya, The Great Illusion (as the term is often described based on Vedic texts), can also be understood as a web of deeply rooted misunderstandings about ourselves and the nature of reality. Why is it that we are so compelled to be in control? What understandings—or misunderstandings—lead us to believe that control is so absolutely imperative to every aspect of our lives? Is it possible that fear and insecurity are behind most expressions of control? There are many answers to these questions, however we might benefit more by not dwelling merely on questions and answers, but rather by passively observing the patterns we live by—which include our judgments and beliefs—and seeing for ourselves the truth behind these patterns and what role they are playing in our own lives. In watching our patterns and gradually (or suddenly) realizing the freedom that lies in letting go of rigid ownership of every thought and action that arises, the possibility of a different way of being arises. We can become aware of certain judgments and beliefs, and instead of automatically agreeing with them or acting on them, we can step back and see what happens if we just let them pass. We can introduce a spaciousness into our awareness that lets us relate to thoughts in intelligent and creative ways, as opposed to being blindly led around by them. With greater awareness comes greater understanding, and we may become aware of certain core beliefs that underlie many of our thoughts. Many people are plagued by thoughts that come from a central belief that they are not whole, that they are not good enough as they are. They may default to thinking they have done something wrong, even when they have actually acted appropriately or even done something good from a place of kindness, creativity or authenticity. Bringing light to such patterns and the beliefs that perpetuate them, we can begin to question their validity and loosen their grip on us. By seeing how we’re acting out patterns and that we’re not unique in this sense, we can have a bit more compassion for ourselves when we make mistakes, as well as for others when they make their own mistakes. We still need to claim responsibility for our actions, but we can also see them from a different angle that makes it possible for us to learn from them and ultimately transform ourselves. Though we think we are in control, this illusion actually binds us to the control of our patterns, of our conditioning, with all their divisive and painful judgments and beliefs. And so, to control is to be controlled. Seeing this as a fact, we might pause and begin to reassess what’s actually occurring in our own lives, what’s driving our thoughts and actions. We can hopefully begin to relax a bit more as we nurture inner peace from a place of awareness, and find some more intelligent and creative approaches to living and relating to each other. JR “Is there in daily existence a way of living in which every form of psychological control ceases to exist?—because control means effort, it means division between the controller and the controlled; I am angry, I must control my anger; I smoke, I must not smoke and I must resist smoking. We are saying there is something totally different and this may be misunderstood and may be rejected altogether because it is very common to say that all life is control—if you do not control you will become permissive, nonsensical, without meaning, therefore you must control. Religions, philosophies, teachers, your family, your mother, they all encourage you to control. We have never asked: Who is the controller?” J. Krishnamurti, The Network of Thought

Experience with Harshad Parekh

  For three afternoons, May 25-27 th Harshad Parekh, a humble Indian man, quietly sat with a small group of 6-8 people, all of whom had attended the weekend retreat/ seminar, at the Swanwick center, with Dr Krishna.    Whilst the weekend had been a series of expositions on the nature and implications of Krishnamurti’s teachings these seminars with Harshad were characterized by little, if any, teaching of ‘something.’ Rather Harshad repeats a simple message, largely through consistent personal example, of ” being nothing and going nowhere.” ( This phrase is borrowed from my memory and attributed to the title of a book by Joko Beck, a now deceased Zen Roshi.) Thus, as group members asked questions or inevitably proffered their own opinions, Harshad just listened. Actually, he listened intently such that folk found it remarkabe that they felt ‘heard,’ and ‘seen.’    This man looks at people in the same way that he looks at a flower, a tree, a bird, that is with choiceless awareness. He himself calls this ‘looking,’ or the pure act of observation, without a watcher or a commentator. It seemed to me that it was equally a listening, simultaneously inwardly and outwardly. Whatever the contributory sensory actions taking place, this is an act of relatively pure perception without the intrusion of a thinker. In this way Harshad indicated that truth becomes apparent, obvious, without question. Whatever is false similarly reveals itself.   As well as simply being with us and our questions Harshad also selected various readings from K. These  reiterated in different terms the idea of freedom being found only in the act of direct perception.(Personally I prefer Toni Packer’s term ‘ beholding,’ as there are times when perception is influenced by thought.)   In K circles we hear a great deal of reference to self inquiry and self knowledge. I have always seen this as problematic in practise, as there is inevitably a thinker implied, or automatically invoked, who is watching and inquiring, out of thought. Not unlike the joint  activity of the process of psychotherapy, ie looking together at a personal problem with the aim, subtle or not so subtle, of solving it. Harshad’s life has been devoted to looking at this issue and learning to get ‘I’ out of it.    For him, observation goes on as a participatory flow with life events without a personal observer, let alone commentator. Over and over he repeated, “Out of silence just look at what is.”   From this looking the outcome emerges by itself. It is an outcome with complete integrity and in fact has the power to possibly change brain functioning. It was this radical message that K spent his life time offering. Not partial and psychological solutions to suffering, arrived at through thinking,  but complete transformation which arises out of participatory intelligence. This is wholistic  or “holy.”   The group were reminded of what K had said, through the showing of some selected videos, to make clear the foundation from which Harshad’s way of being and living have arisen.  He himself has made a careful life long study of what K said, as well as maintaining ongoing correspondence with him until his death. He indicated that the best way for us to study the K teachings is to contemplate small sections of writing and live with these until they penetrate without effort. He also suggested that these teachings are best absorbed in silence, likely the necessary accompaniment for real contemplation.   I felt extraordinarily privileged to have sat in a beautiful garden, bathed in sunshine, bird song and the perfume of roses, with this authentic man. As well, for being with a  small, yet committed group of people who are seriously listening and grateful for some insight, which is readily available through this direct and experiential approach.   Clarity, peace and ease are the normal states that Harshad claims as his fundamental way of living and being in the world . To be of it, participatory but not demanding or possessing, seems extraordinary in this day and age. My observation was that at the end of these few days those who attended felt those qualities more deeply.   As such, learning had taken place and it was learning without effort.    

The Transformation of Consciousness, with Prof. P. Krishna

It was my pleasure and privilege to attend P. Krishna’s retreat, Krishnamurti and the Transformation of Consciousness. He opened the weekend by giving a public talk on Science and Spirituality, which I found very interesting and relevant. Why is it that humanity has made such leaps and bounds scientifically and technologically, but remained so ignorant in the realm of self-knowledge? He went into this question in great deal, and explained the thoroughness of scientific inquiry in comparison with the shallow acceptance of belief that has kept humanity in spiritual darkness. He discussed order and disorder, and what those terms might mean both inwardly and in society. It’s extremely interesting that the inquiry in K’s teachings has certain parallels to scientific inquiry, in the degree of diligence and the emphasis on actually getting to the truth of the matter. Over the weekend, Krishna emphasized the importance of the learning mind, of being able to inquire into our conditioned responses, always from a place of passive awareness. He explained that by inquiring into beliefs that are causing anger and other such oppressive feelings, we can gradually dissolve the conditioning that is such an obstruction to inward freedom. He explained with great clarity how such freedom is synonymous with order, and how our conditioning is the root of disorder (both inwardly and outwardly). I returned on Monday to attend one of Harshad Parekh’s dialogues, which Krishna attended also. It was very interesting to hear these two different views on K’s teachings. Harshad is very keen on the simple act of watching, of passive awareness, whereas Krishna believes the process is a little more involved than this. Harshad shared his experience with K’s teachings and how they transformed his relationship with thought, himself and the world. Ultimately truth is a pathless land, and what this means to me on one level is that K can share his observations with us, but the process that leads to insight is a very personal one, which requires each of us to awaken a certain intuitive intelligence that can guide us towards greater self-knowledge. One person’s understanding may not lead to another person’s insight. I think that certain understandings are very worthy of being shared with others, but the thing is that each person’s insight can ultimately only come about in a way that arises out of their own intuition, their own natural intelligence. Personally, one of the more powerful moments over the weekend came when we watched a video wherein K discussed the fact that the “analyzer is the analyzed”, and why psychoanalysis usually only perpetuates psychological division. It was this segment that led to a personal insight about the actuality of phrases such as “the observer is the observed” and “the thinker is the thought. I’ll be sharing “my” understanding of this in greater detail in future posts.  I would like to thank P. Krishna, Harshad Parekh, Ralph Tiller, the Krishnamurti Education Centre of Canada, and all the wonderful participants for this very valuable weekend retreat.      

Weekend Retreat at the Centre

Krishnamurti and the Transformation of Consciousness Weekend Retreat with Prof. P Krishna May 24 – 26, 2015 Professor Krishna is a long-time associate of J. Krishnamurti and former Principal of the Rajghat Krishnamurti School in Varanasi, India.  He is considered to be deeply versed in K’s teachings and an extremely eloquent speaker on the subjects K felt to be crucial for a transformation of human consciousness.  On Friday evening he gave a public talk on Science and Spirituality which was attended by 26 people all included.  He spoke of the differences and similarities between the two fields and why, despite huge leaps in knowledge in the scientific realm, there has been so little progress in understanding of ourselves and how to live harmoniously.  He introduced some ideas which became the main themes of the weekend, emphasizing the importance of inquiring into human behaviour and the need to employ a different mode of exploration than our conventional ways of thinking, which can never bring transformation.  What is required is not knowledge in the usual sense but direct looking into ourselves, self awareness, and insight, none of which are based in thinking.  The talk was followed by a question and answer session.  Participants commented on the clarity and helpfulness of the presentation and a number of them who had not already done so signed up for the full weekend retreat.  19 people in all were present for the weekend sessions. On Saturday morning Krishna gave a talk on the central tenets of Krishnamurti’s teachings such as the statement “you are the world’,  the need for individual transformation if there is to be any social change, and the power of “passive awareness”.  The talk was followed by a lively group discussion.  The rest of the day and Sunday included two videos of K talks, more talks by Krishna, and further group inquiries.  The main focus continued to be the art of learning about ourselves and the right place of everything in life, always emphasizing the need to look for ourselves rather than thinking and analyzing, which do have a place but do not bring real transformation. The clarity and logical precision with which Krishna spoke had a strong impact and I noticed that as I listened my own understanding seemed to deepen in a way that was more profound than the mere accumulation of knowledge.  Participants gave feedback that they were very happy with their experience of the retreat.  A book has recently been published about Krishna’s experiences with Krishnamurti entitled A Jewel On a Silver Platter:  Remembering Jiddhu Krishnamurti.  More information and articles can be found on Krishna’s website:  www.pkrishna.org

A Challenging Day of Observation

Today has been a challenging day for me. Last night I had a meaningful exchange on Facebook with Harshad Parekh, who I first met last year at a retreat he was facilitating at Swanwick. In response to my recent observations about conditioning, he described a type of seeing that is not rooted in the psychological structure of thought, which is the past. While I think it’s important to be aware of and discuss the way social power structures condition us, what Harshad was describing and what K refers to actually points to a conditioning that is much deeper than just external psycho-social conditioning (although not separate from it). Later on last night I finished listening to a talk by K, in which he described what it means to look at a fact without running away from it or labeling it, without responding by moving into thought in any way whatsoever.  He spoke of looking without translating, and he used the term “pure observation” to describe this type of looking. It really struck a chord with me, and for the rest of the evening and much of today I’ve been watching myself in this way. What I found was I was able to observe in a way that meant I was not responding to my experiences throughout the day by moving into thought, into old or new beliefs. What I started to understand today was that this type of seeing is an action that has the power to end both belief and the entire mechanism of discursive thought. The thing is—and this is why today has been challenging for me—this isn’t a comforting practice, at least not for me at this point. As K points out, we are compelled to move into thought, into beliefs and knowledge, out of a deep-rooted desire to escape our basic insecurity. And without moving into thought, I’m left with a very simple and raw experience of myself, of being alive in this moment. I’m very used to keeping myself psychologically-occupied in a variety of ways—whether I’m perpetuating old beliefs or forming new ones—but today I refrained from my usual mental patterns as best I could by simply observing in this way. There is a certain peace in that space which is new to me, but it’s such a different experience for me, to simply be with myself like that, that I must admit it’s a bit disconcerting. So, the question is perhaps, am I really willing to end this whole internal process of belief? My thoughts give me a great deal of comfort, but to be honest I’d say they have caused me more grief than anything. Am I willing to let go of all that? Do I really want this kind of freedom? I will continue observing in this way.  JR